Introduction
Application Portfolio Rationalization (APR) is a critical component of Enterprise Architecture (EA). It cannot be effectively executed without considering the broader EA framework. Whether or not an organization has a formally established EA function, APR must align with the enterprise vision and strategy. The APR journey begins by examining EA, particularly Business Architecture, and subsequently deriving IT and Technology Architecture.
Before initiating an APR exercise, it is essential to analyze business processes, the organization's operating model, and architecture maturity. A gap analysis should be conducted to identify misalignments between IT strategy and business strategy. This document focuses on the practical execution of APR once the decision to proceed has been made.
Objectives of APR
APR involves the analysis and reorganization of applications within a portfolio to achieve the following:
Reduction in application count – Eliminating redundancy
Complexity reduction – Simplifying the IT landscape
Risk reduction – Mitigating operational and technological risks
IT-business alignment – Ensuring IT supports standard business processes
Cost reduction – Lowering maintenance and operational expenses
How APR Reduces Costs
Lower maintenance costs by removing redundant applications
Reduced infrastructure expenses due to consolidation
Improved IT management efficiency through decreased complexity
Steps in APR
Assessment
Analysis
Planning
Assessment: Gathering Information
The first step in APR is gathering comprehensive data about all applications:
Application inventory: Owners, versions, technologies, platforms
Mapping applications to business processes
Analysis: Evaluating the Portfolio
Various aspects must be considered to assess an organization's application portfolio:
Business Analysis
The business value of an application is determined by its alignment with the company's strategic vision.
Applications critical to business operations and continuity hold high business value.
Technology Analysis
Technical quality assessment determines whether an application should be replaced, modernized, or maintained.
Two key aspects of technical value:
Software Quality (functional performance, code standards, production feedback)
Hardware Quality (scalability, compatibility, upgradability, maintenance challenges)
Software Quality Evaluation Methods:
Testing – Functional and performance testing (e.g., response time, scalability)
Static Code Analysis – Identifying potential issues affecting maintainability, security, and robustness
Production Feedback – Collecting user experiences on system reliability and performance
Hardware Quality Considerations:
Scalability constraints
Upgrade limitations
Integration challenges with newer hardware
Support and maintenance difficulties
Risk Assessment
Applications with poor technical quality but high business value pose significant risks.
Risks should be identified, quantified, and mitigated through contingency planning.
Consider risk exposure, probability, and business impact.
Cost Analysis
The total cost of ownership (TCO) of an application includes:
Support costs
Maintenance expenses
Upgrade investments
Licensing fees
Planning: Rationalization Strategies
Based on the assessment and analysis, a rationalization plan is formulated:
Low-value, old applications → Retire
High-value, old applications → Modernize
Redundant applications → Eliminate
Additionally, infrastructure and platform standardization should be part of the consolidation strategy.
Conclusion APR is a structured process aimed at optimizing an organization's application portfolio by eliminating redundancies, reducing costs, and aligning IT with business objectives. A systematic approach involving assessment, analysis, and planning ensures that applications contribute positively to the organization's strategic goals while maintaining efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Comments
Post a Comment