Skip to main content

GEN AI Generated Architecture Diagrams in PUML

GEN AI tried to create PUML files but there are two confusion to it: It may not give the correct view point name and it may not generate a valid diagram content. 

S.No. GEN AI Generated Diagram Matching AM Sample Reference Remark Numering
1 01_Organization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.1 Organization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 1
2 02_Stakeholder_View.puml ✅ Yes C.2.1 Stakeholder Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 2
3 03_GoalRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.2.2 Goal Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 3
4 04_RequirementRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.2.3 Requirements Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 4
5 05_MeaningValue_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: Value & Meaning Mapping (TOGAF, ISO 42010) Could be merged into Motivation Viewpoint -
6 06_Motivation_View.puml ✅ Yes C.2.4 Motivation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 5
7 07_Strategy_View.puml ✅ Yes C.3.1 Strategy Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 6
8 08_CapabilityMap_View.puml ✅ Yes C.3.2 Capability Map Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 7
9 09_Valuestream_View.puml ✅ Yes C.3.3 Value Stream Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 8
10 10_OutcomeRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.3.4 Outcome Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 9
11 11_ResourceMap_View.puml ✅ Yes C.3.5 Resource Map Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 10
12 12_StrategyOverview_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: Strategy Layer Overview (TOGAF, SAFe) Can be merged into Strategy Viewpoint -
13 13_CapabilityMapOverview_View.puml ❌ No Duplicate of Capability Map Viewpoint Should be removed -
14 14_Valuestream_Overview_View.puml ❌ No Duplicate of Value Stream Viewpoint Should be removed -
15 15_BusinessRoleActor.puml ✅ Yes C.1.1 Organization Viewpoint Duplicate 1
16 16_BusinessProcess.puml ✅ Yes C.1.10 Business Process Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 11
17 17_BusinessService.puml ✅ Yes C.1.12 Service Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 12
18 18_FunctionalDecomposition.puml ❌ No EA Practice: Functional Breakdown (TOGAF, Business Architecture Guild) Should be part of Business Process View -
19 19_2_BusinessProcessCooperation_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.10 Business Process Cooperation Viewpoint Duplicate 11
20 19_BusinessProcessCooperation_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.10 Business Process Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 13
21 20_ApplicationStructure_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.2 Application Structure Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 14
22 21_ApplicationCollaboration_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.11 Application Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 15
23 22_ApplicationUsage_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.8 Application Usage Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 16
24 23_ApplicationBehaviour_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: Functional Behavior Mapping (TOGAF, BPMN) Should be merged into Application Process View -
25 24_ApplicationProcess_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.10 Business Process Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 17
26 25_1_ApplicationInteraction_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.11 Application Cooperation Viewpoint Duplicate 15
27 25_2_ApplicationInteraction_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.11 Application Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 18
28 26_2_ApplicationServiceRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.12 Service Realization Viewpoint Duplicate 12
29 26_ApplicationServiceRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.12 Service Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 19
30 27_ApplicationCooperation_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.11 Application Cooperation Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 20
31 28_TechnologyUsage_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.9 Technology Usage Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 21
32 29_Infrastructure_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.4 Technology Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 22
33 30_PhysicalInfrastructure_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.6 Physical Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 23
34 31_TechnologyApplication_View.puml ❌ No Redundant—covered by Application & Technology Viewpoints Should be removed -
35 32_TechnologyCollaboration_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: IT Architecture Dependencies (TOGAF, SAFe, IT4IT) Could be part of Technology Viewpoint -
36 33_TechnologyProcess_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: ITSM & Process Mapping (ITIL, TOGAF, BPMN) Should be part of Implementation View -
37 34_ImplementationMigrationStrategy_View.puml ✅ Yes C.4.3 Implementation and Migration Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 24
38 35_PlateauTransition_View.puml ✅ Yes C.4.2 Migration Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 25
39 36_GapAnalysis_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: TOGAF Gap Analysis Technique Should be part of Migration View -
40 37_AccessControlSecurity_View.puml ❌ No EA Practice: ISO 27001, NIST, Zero Trust Security Could be merged into Technology or Implementation View -
41 38_Integration_View.puml ❌ No TOGAF, EIP, API Gateway Best Practices Could be part of Application Cooperation View -
42 39_NetworkflowAndSecurity_View.puml ❌ No C4 Model (Level 3 & 4), TOGAF, ISO 27001 Should be part of Technology View -
43 40_DisasterRecovery_View.puml ❌ No TOGAF, ITIL, ISO 22301 Should be merged into Implementation & Migration -
44 41_ServiceRealization_View.puml ✅ Yes C.1.12 Service Realization Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 26
45 42_PerformanceMonitoring_View.puml ❌ No IT4IT, TOGAF, ITIL Monitoring Framework Should be part of Technology View -
46 43_ComplianceAudit_View.puml ❌ No EA Compliance (ISO 27001, GDPR, NIST, TOGAF Security View) Should be part of Technology or Security View -
47 44_ImplementationMigration_View.puml ✅ Yes C.4.3 Implementation and Migration Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 27
48 45_WorkPackageMigrationStrategy.puml ✅ Yes C.4.1 Project Viewpoint Similar to ArchiMate Sample 28



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Virtual environments in python

 Creating virtual environments is essential for isolating dependencies and ensuring consistency across different projects. Here are the main methods and tools available, along with their pros, cons, and recommendations : 1. venv (Built-in Python Virtual Environment) Overview: venv is a lightweight virtual environment module included in Python (since Python 3.3). It allows you to create isolated environments without additional dependencies. How to Use: python -m venv myenv source myenv/bin/activate # On macOS/Linux myenv\Scripts\activate # On Windows Pros: ✅ Built-in – No need to install anything extra. ✅ Lightweight – Minimal overhead compared to other tools. ✅ Works across all platforms . ✅ Good for simple projects . Cons: ❌ No dependency management – You still need pip and requirements.txt . ❌ Not as feature-rich as other tools . ❌ No package isolation per project directory (requires manual activation). Recommendation: Use venv if you need a simple, lightweight solut...
Post a Comment
Read more

Building a Simple Text Generator: A Hands-on Introduction

Introduction Text generation is one of the most exciting applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) . From autocorrect and chatbots to AI-generated stories and news articles , text generation models help machines produce human-like text. In this blog post, we’ll introduce a simple yet effective text generation method using Markov Chains . Unlike deep learning models like GPT, this approach doesn’t require complex neural networks—it relies on probability-based word transitions to create text. We’ll walk through: ✅ The concept of Markov Chains and how they apply to text generation. ✅ A step-by-step implementation , fetching Wikipedia text and training a basic text generator. ✅ Example outputs and future improvements. The Concept of Markov Chains in Text Generation A Markov Chain is a probabilistic model that predicts future states (or words) based only on the current state (or word), rather than the full sentence history. How it works in text generation: 1️⃣ We analyze a gi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mastering Trade-Off Analysis in System Architecture: A Strategic Guide for Architects

 In system architecture and design, balancing conflicting system qualities is both an art and a science. Trade-off analysis is a strategic evaluation process that enables architects to make informed decisions that align with business goals and technical constraints. By prioritizing essential system attributes while acknowledging inevitable compromises, architects can craft resilient and efficient solutions. This enhanced guide provides actionable insights and recommendations for architects aiming to master trade-off analysis for impactful architectural decisions. 1. Understanding Trade-Off Analysis Trade-off analysis involves identifying and evaluating the conflicting requirements and design decisions within a system. Architects must balance critical aspects like performance, scalability, cost, security, and maintainability. Since no system can be optimized for every quality simultaneously, prioritization based on project goals is essential. Actionable Insights: Define key quality ...
Post a Comment
Read more