In the IT industry, we’ve often been taught by our seniors, managers, and industry experts that project success depends on making the right decisions at the right time. The key phases that shape a project's outcome are:
- Bid Phase – Right people, right decisions on solution, estimates, scope, implicit requirements, and schedule.
- Project Initiation Phase – Right people, right decisions on project scope, risk identification, resource allocation, and feasibility.
- Project Inception Phase – Right people, right decisions on detailed requirement analysis, design, planning, and stakeholder alignment.
Yet, despite knowing this, many projects still reach the construction or post-construction phase in a broken state—burdened by flawed assumptions, missed requirements, and unrealistic timelines. At this point, teams often try to fix everything with a "superhero" hire—a single expert expected to undo months (or years) of missteps.
Why Does This Happen?
In many cases, project failures are not due to a lack of knowledge but because of deeper organizational behaviors and mindset issues:
✅ Fear of Speaking Up: Team members worry that raising concerns will make them look like a “problem child” rather than a team player.
✅ Short-Term Mindset: Leaders delay acknowledging risks or failures, hoping they can be fixed later—an approach mistakenly seen as "the art of management."
✅ Situational Pressure: Teams bend to unrealistic expectations rather than challenging them.
✅ Lack of Process Discipline: Despite knowing the importance of phases 1-3, teams fail to rigorously apply due diligence in bid and planning phases.
What Can Be Done?
Even if gaps weren’t detected in the bid phase or due diligence phase, it’s still possible to recover—but only if identified early enough.
✔ Conduct a thorough analysis during project initiation & inception: If requirements, effort, and risks weren’t properly assessed earlier, use this phase to realign expectations.
✔ Communicate with leadership: Project managers still have 6–12 months before execution to mitigate risks—if they are given the correct data in time.
✔ Challenge assumptions: Question unrealistic deadlines, missing requirements, and overlooked dependencies—rather than hoping for a last-minute fix.
Who Can Take Ownership?
✔ Requirement analysis, estimation, planning, and risk management aren’t purely technical tasks. Any senior IT leader, project manager, or business analyst with sufficient experience can drive these aspects.
✔ Specialized implementation tasks (e.g., IBM BAW setup, JBoss clustering) may require dedicated technical specialists, but early-phase project decisions must not be left solely to engineers.
What Skills Are Needed?
🚀 Ownership & Initiative: Taking responsibility rather than waiting for someone else to act.
🚀 Requirement Analysis & Breakdown: The ability to structure complex requirements into small, manageable tasks.
🚀 Work Breakdown & Estimation: Breaking work into 4-hour task units to ensure precise scheduling and realistic planning.
🚀 Dependency Mapping & Critical Path Planning: Identifying major dependencies between features, user stories, and technical components to determine the most efficient execution sequence.
🚀 Risk Management & Mitigation: Proactively identifying issues rather than reacting to failures.
Final Thoughts: Stop Searching for Superheroes—Build Strong Foundations
A well-managed project does not require last-minute rescues. If the right people make the right decisions at the right time, the need for “superheroes” disappears.
Instead of fixing symptoms in the later phases, let's address root causes early. Project success isn’t about crisis management—it’s about disciplined execution, structured planning, and the courage to challenge bad assumptions before they become disasters.
👉 What’s your experience with project planning failures? Have you seen last-minute "superhero hires" fix—or fail to fix—broken projects? Share your thoughts in the comments!
Comments
Post a Comment